Loaded data file C:\Users\zirbel\Documents\JAR3D\\HL\3.48\diagnostic\HL_RandomMotifSequencesNonCan_7.mat
CGGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.15, deficit  2.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.45, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
CUCG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -3.83, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
UAAA 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.06, deficit  1.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  88.05, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUCG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -3.83, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.34, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.19, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.61, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CACG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -5.77, deficit  1.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.94, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CUCG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -3.83, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CCUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -6.00, deficit  0.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  64.28, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
CAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.66, deficit  0.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.24, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUCC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.03, deficit  0.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.89, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
UUCA 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.04, deficit  0.21, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.80, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CUCG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -3.83, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GGGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.10, deficit  2.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.01, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
GAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.19, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.61, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUCG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -3.83, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
AAGU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -5.10, deficit  2.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  77.10, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -6.05, deficit  3.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.05, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UACG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -8.00, deficit  4.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.50, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
UGAA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.84, deficit  1.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  79.76, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UCUA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -5.80, deficit  0.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  66.33, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
CCAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.36, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CAGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.55, deficit  1.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  82.90, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUCC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.03, deficit  0.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.89, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.34, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GCUC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -5.90, deficit  0.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  65.29, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.54, deficit  0.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.51, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GUCU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -6.19, deficit  2.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  75.17, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
UUUG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -6.56, deficit  2.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  71.18, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.34, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.34, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
UUUA 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.55, deficit  0.72, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.42, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.19, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.61, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GCUC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -5.90, deficit  0.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  65.29, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUCC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.03, deficit  0.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.89, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UAGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -6.94, deficit  4.02, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.71, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UCAA 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.84, deficit  1.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.18, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.66, deficit  0.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.24, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.34, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GAGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -5.08, deficit  2.16, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  77.27, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UACA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -5.98, deficit  2.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.74, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
AGAU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -5.00, deficit  2.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.14, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.54, deficit  0.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.51, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
AGAAU 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.98, deficit  0.80, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  91.58, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
CGGAG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -4.35, deficit  0.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.64, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55                                 
CAAAG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -3.71, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGGGG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.81, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
AUUUU 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_33507.2,  4 NTs,                 UUUUA,score      -3.10, deficit  0.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.61, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F-s55                           
GUACC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -4.96, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.31, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGAGG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_05692.1,  3 NTs,                CGUAGG,score      -7.71, deficit  1.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.56, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
UAUGG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_95237.1,  4 NTs,                 UUUGA,score      -6.21, deficit  2.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.21, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35                         
CUUUG 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_33507.2,  4 NTs,                 UUUUA,score      -3.09, deficit  0.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.65, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F-s55                           
GCUUC 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_70970.1,  5 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.32, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-s35                             
CGGGG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.81, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CCAUG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -7.87, deficit  4.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUCUC 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -3.78, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
UGAGA 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_05692.1,  3 NTs,                CGUAGG,score      -7.80, deficit  1.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.69, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
UGAAA 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.97, deficit  0.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  91.70, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
CGAAG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.55, deficit  0.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  96.13, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
CUAUG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -3.69, deficit  0.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.35, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CCUUG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_70970.1,  5 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.38, deficit  1.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.27, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-s35                             
UAUCA 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -5.56, deficit  1.85, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.90, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
UGGGA 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.89, deficit  1.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.98, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GAUCC 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -5.45, deficit  1.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.08, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUGUG 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -3.43, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CCAAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_70970.1,  5 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.89, deficit  1.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.90, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-s35                             
CUGUG 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -3.43, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUGUC 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -3.61, deficit  0.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.10, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUAUC 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -3.87, deficit  0.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  95.46, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUGUC 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -3.61, deficit  0.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.10, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUCUC 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -3.78, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
CGAGG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_05692.1,  3 NTs,                CGUAGG,score      -7.71, deficit  1.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.56, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CAAGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_94352.4,  5 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -5.94, deficit  0.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-F-F                         
GUUCC 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -5.30, deficit  1.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  80.35, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUCUG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -3.84, deficit  0.05, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.44, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
CUGCG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.81, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GUCUC 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -3.78, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
CAACG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -4.81, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
UGGAG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -6.51, deficit  2.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.92, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55                                 
GGCGC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_12703.2,  5 NTs,                 GGCCC,score      -6.04, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.48, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
GGGGC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.88, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CAUCG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -5.32, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.48, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CAAGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_94352.4,  5 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -5.94, deficit  0.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-F-F                         
CGCAG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.18, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
GGGAC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -4.27, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55                                 
CGCGG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_69459.1,  2 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -7.74, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.48, ed 99, 1 cWW                                     
CGCAG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.18, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
GAGCC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -6.04, deficit  2.33, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.89, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGAAG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.55, deficit  0.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  96.13, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
AUACU 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -4.92, deficit  1.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.74, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GCUUC 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_70970.1,  5 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.32, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-s35                             
CAGGG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.81, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GAGGC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.88, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
AAAAGU 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_96776.2,  6 NTs,                AAAAUU,score      -6.99, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.48, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-F                   
GGACAC 1  Matches 28; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -6.29, deficit  4.54, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.96, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CUAUUG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_60357.1,  5 NTs,                GUAUUC,score      -5.40, deficit  1.99, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  79.04, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-s35-s35                         
GGUGAC 1  Matches 28; best is  HL_16898.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -5.75, deficit  0.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.21, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55                 
UUGUUG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_58912.1,  4 NTs,                CUGUUG,score      -5.14, deficit  2.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.17, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-F                           
GGAAAC 1  Matches 33; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.17, deficit  0.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  93.56, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
GUAUCC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_60357.1,  5 NTs,                GUAUUC,score      -4.51, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35                         
GUAAUC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_96776.2,  6 NTs,                AAAAUU,score      -5.58, deficit  0.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  66.38, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-F                   
CAAUGG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_52240.1,  5 NTs,                AAAUUU,score      -5.61, deficit  1.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.84, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
CUGCUG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_32617.1,  5 NTs,                UUGGUA,score      -4.72, deficit  0.99, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.03, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSH                             
GUCAUC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_00996.1,  5 NTs,                GUCUUC,score      -4.95, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35                 
GAACCC 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_35894.3,  6 NTs,                UAGUAA,score      -8.39, deficit  4.54, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.12, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-cSW-s33-F-s35                   
CGGCAG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_57204.1,  5 NTs,                UGGAAA,score      -5.59, deficit  1.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.97, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-F-F-s35                         
AGGCAU 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_57204.1,  5 NTs,                UGGAAA,score      -5.60, deficit  1.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.94, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-F-F-s35                         
AACGAU 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_86880.4,  5 NTs,               GCUCGUC,score      -5.92, deficit  0.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.35, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
GAAAAC 1  Matches 30; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -6.24, deficit  4.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.52, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CGAAAG 1  Matches 32; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.07, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.63, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
GUCCCC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_43527.1,  6 NTs,               CGCCGAG,score      -7.11, deficit  1.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.61, ed 99, 1 cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
CGGCAG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_57204.1,  5 NTs,                UGGAAA,score      -5.59, deficit  1.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.97, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-F-F-s35                         
CGGGGG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -7.29, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.04, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
UAAAGA 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_96776.2,  6 NTs,                AAAAUU,score      -7.04, deficit  1.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.93, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-F                   
CGGAAG 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -9.82, deficit  6.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.78, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UUCUCA 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_76360.1,  5 NTs,                GUGUCC,score      -5.59, deficit  1.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.85, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
GGGCAC 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_44781.1,  5 NTs,                GUUCAC,score      -4.77, deficit  0.97, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.19, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35             
GGUGAU 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_16898.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -7.72, deficit  2.24, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  76.43, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55                 
UGAUGG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_50959.1,  6 NTs,               UGAUGAG,score      -9.15, deficit  4.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.95, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
UGCCGG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_43527.1,  6 NTs,               CGCCGAG,score      -8.12, deficit  2.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.03, ed 99, 1 cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
CUCACG 1  Matches  9; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -6.49, deficit  4.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.89, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GGCGAC 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_18218.2,  6 NTs,             GCCUAGGAC,score      -7.31, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35                     
GGUGGC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_05692.1,  3 NTs,                CGUAGG,score      -6.00, deficit  0.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.64, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGAGGC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_28567.3,  6 NTs,                GAGUAC,score      -7.24, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.29, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
CGUCGG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_94386.1,  6 NTs,               GUGAAGC,score      -5.88, deficit -0.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  72.74, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F-F-s35                         
UUAUUA 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_60357.1,  5 NTs,                GUAUUC,score      -5.42, deficit  2.01, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.81, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-s35-s35                         
ACGACU 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -6.95, deficit  0.93, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.00, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
CAUCCG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_02733.4,  6 NTs,               CAUGCCG,score      -3.70, deficit  1.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  70.48, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
UAAGAA 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_86880.4,  5 NTs,               GCUCGUC,score      -6.15, deficit  0.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  89.96, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
GGAGGC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_28567.3,  6 NTs,                GAGUAC,score      -7.24, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.29, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
CAUCAG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_01008.4,  5 NTs,                GAUCAC,score      -2.84, deficit  0.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.78, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F                       
CUGGUG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_32617.1,  5 NTs,                UUGGUA,score      -3.87, deficit  0.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.64, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-cSH                             
GGUUGC 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_94386.1,  6 NTs,               GUGAAGC,score      -5.78, deficit -0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  73.80, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F-F-s35                         
CGACGG 1  Matches 18; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -8.32, deficit  6.56, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.96, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CUGCUG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_32617.1,  5 NTs,                UUGGUA,score      -4.72, deficit  0.99, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.03, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSH                             
CAAAAG 1  Matches 32; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -5.41, deficit  3.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  62.06, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CGUCGG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_94386.1,  6 NTs,               GUGAAGC,score      -5.88, deficit -0.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  72.74, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F-F-s35                         
UAGCGA 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_69459.1,  2 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -7.31, deficit  1.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.40, ed 99, 2 cWW                                     
GUGGUC 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_32617.1,  5 NTs,                UUGGUA,score      -3.74, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-cSH                             
CCCUUG 1  Matches 15; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score     -14.13, deficit 12.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  -0.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CUGACG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_76360.1,  5 NTs,                GUGUCC,score      -5.56, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CCGACG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -6.68, deficit  0.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.89, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
CGAUGG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_05692.1,  3 NTs,                CGUAGG,score      -5.92, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.84, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55                             
UGUUGAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_49196.2,  6 NTs,             AUUCCCAUU,score     -11.86, deficit  5.93, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.32, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s55-s35                 
CCAAAUG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_86880.4,  5 NTs,               GCUCGUC,score      -6.20, deficit  1.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  89.49, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
GAUCAAC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_67216.4,  7 NTs,               CGGCGAG,score      -8.04, deficit  4.82, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.14, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
GAAUCAC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_69774.3,  6 NTs,               GAAACAC,score      -6.45, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.29, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-tSW-s35-s35-s35                 
GUUCUUC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_69677.1,  5 NTs,               CUUUUUG,score      -6.33, deficit  1.68, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.79, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-F                           
CUCCUUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_00996.1,  5 NTs,                GUCUUC,score      -7.61, deficit  3.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.81, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35                 
UUCACUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_30937.1,  6 NTs,               GUAACGC,score      -5.83, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.75, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35                     
AAAGUAU 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_96487.1,  4 NTs,               CAUGUAG,score      -7.81, deficit  1.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.85, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
CAGCAGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_32512.6,  7 NTs,               GACUGGC,score      -6.86, deficit  1.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.28, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
GGAAAAC 1  Matches 30; best is  HL_27747.3,  6 NTs,               AGAAAUU,score      -6.23, deficit  2.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  76.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55-cSH         
GGCAAGC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_12053.1,  5 NTs,               CGCAACG,score      -6.90, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
GUGACCC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_16845.5,  5 NTs,               CUUAUCG,score      -7.54, deficit  2.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.70, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35                 
UGUUCAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_49196.2,  6 NTs,             AUUCCCAUU,score     -10.39, deficit  4.46, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.73, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s55-s35                 
GGAACGC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_30937.1,  6 NTs,               GUAACGC,score      -7.93, deficit  3.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.06, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35                     
UUCGCUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_30937.1,  6 NTs,               GUAACGC,score      -7.44, deficit  3.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.51, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35                     
AGUGUGU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_82678.2,  6 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -6.41, deficit  1.45, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.17, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F                     
CGAAUGG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_40469.1,  4 NTs,               CGAAUAG,score      -6.06, deficit  1.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.56, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-F                           
CAAGAAG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_43610.4,  7 NTs,               GGAGACC,score      -5.59, deficit  2.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.58, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35           
GAAUCGC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_59445.1,  7 NTs,               CAAUAGG,score      -6.17, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.48, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-F-s35-s35                   
CUUGGUG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_54035.5,  7 NTs,              AUUGAGUU,score      -7.85, deficit  3.58, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.95, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35         
UCAUAUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_93573.1,  6 NTs,               CCUUGUG,score      -9.39, deficit  4.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.25, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-s35                         
GGGUGAC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -7.56, deficit  1.55, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.11, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
CUCUACG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_06645.1,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score      -8.16, deficit  3.11, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.11, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-F-F-s35                     
UCCAUAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_90961.1,  4 NTs,               CGCAUAG,score      -9.14, deficit  4.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.90, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55                     
CGCUCGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_94386.1,  6 NTs,               GUGAAGC,score      -8.74, deficit  2.45, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.66, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F-F-s35                         
GUCAAUC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_86880.4,  5 NTs,               GCUCGUC,score      -8.40, deficit  3.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.73, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
CGUAAGG 1  Matches 19; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -7.63, deficit  5.88, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.07, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
UAAAACA 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_24403.1,  6 NTs,               GAAAAUC,score      -6.28, deficit  1.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.85, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
GGGCAAC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_67216.4,  7 NTs,               CGGCGAG,score      -5.00, deficit  1.77, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  65.90, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
AUGGCUU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_17899.1,  8 NTs,              GUGUCUAC,score      -9.54, deficit  5.78, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.02, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-tSW-s35-s35-s35         
GCAAUCC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_25660.1,  6 NTs,               CGAAUAG,score      -5.91, deficit  0.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.97, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-F-s35               
GUAGCCC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_43610.4,  7 NTs,               GGAGACC,score      -8.12, deficit  4.70, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.06, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35           
UUAGCUA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_30937.1,  6 NTs,               GUAACGC,score      -6.11, deficit  1.88, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.21, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35                     
UGAGCAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -6.92, deficit  1.78, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.68, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
GGCAAAC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_12053.1,  5 NTs,               CGCAACG,score      -6.90, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
GAUAAAC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_96487.1,  4 NTs,               CAUGUAG,score      -6.69, deficit  0.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.06, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
UGAACGA 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_30937.1,  6 NTs,               GUAACGC,score      -7.86, deficit  3.64, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.72, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35                     
GACAGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_43527.1,  6 NTs,               CGCCGAG,score      -6.98, deficit  1.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.47, ed 99, 2 cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
GCCGACC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_43610.4,  7 NTs,               GGAGACC,score      -8.48, deficit  5.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.65, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35           
GGGAUAC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_90961.1,  4 NTs,               CGCAUAG,score      -5.97, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.73, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55                     
UUGAUCA 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_16845.5,  5 NTs,               CUUAUCG,score      -6.00, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.51, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35                 
CGAGAAG 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -7.29, deficit  2.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  77.37, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
CGUAGAG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -8.15, deficit  2.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.95, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
CGCAAGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_12053.1,  5 NTs,               CGCAACG,score      -6.82, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
CCAAACG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_16898.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -6.97, deficit  1.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.75, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55                 
CUCAGCG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_06645.1,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score      -8.16, deficit  3.11, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.11, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-F-F-s35                     
GAAUUCC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_50374.1,  4 NTs,               UAAUUCA,score      -5.87, deficit  0.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.11, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
GGAAAAC 1  Matches 30; best is  HL_27747.3,  6 NTs,               AGAAAUU,score      -6.23, deficit  2.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  76.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55-cSH         
AAGUCAU 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_35894.3,  6 NTs,                UAGUAA,score      -9.15, deficit  5.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.15, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSW-s33-F-s35                   
AGAUUGU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_37407.1,  5 NTs,               GAGUAUC,score      -6.33, deficit  1.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.49, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35                     
GGAUGGAC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_72451.4,  8 NTs,              GGAACAAC,score      -8.12, deficit  5.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.21, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s35                 
CGAGAUGG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -9.27, deficit  1.68, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.19, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CGCAUCGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -8.21, deficit  0.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.89, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CGCUCAGG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_01181.4,  7 NTs,              GCACCGUC,score      -9.90, deficit  3.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.23, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GUUUUCCC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_33172.1,  5 NTs,             CCUUUCACG,score      -7.55, deficit  3.54, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.76, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55-F                   
GUUAGUCC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_93436.1,  7 NTs,             GUUCGAUCC,score      -9.88, deficit  4.21, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.32, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-F-s35-s35                       
UGUUUUGG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_94651.1,  7 NTs,              CGUUCUAG,score      -6.82, deficit  2.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.75, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSS-s35-s55                 
CGUGUCGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_86769.2,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score      -7.97, deficit  0.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.83, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSH-s55         
GUUCAGCC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_06645.1,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score      -6.22, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.45, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-F-F-s35                     
GGGAGAGC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_27757.1,  6 NTs,              CGGAAAGG,score      -6.51, deficit  1.68, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.65, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-F                   
CUGUCAUG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_17899.1,  8 NTs,              GUGUCUAC,score      -8.37, deficit  4.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.40, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-tSW-s35-s35-s35         
ACGGCUCU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_17899.1,  8 NTs,              GUGUCUAC,score      -8.75, deficit  4.99, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.16, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s35-s35-tSW-s35-s35-s35         
CGCAGGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_44769.1,  8 NTs,             CGCACGGAG,score      -8.78, deficit  2.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.94, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35                 
CGAAGCGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_66171.2,  5 NTs,              CGACACAG,score      -7.71, deficit  4.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.71, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
CGAUGUGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_94651.1,  7 NTs,              CGUUCUAG,score      -8.40, deficit  3.98, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.03, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSS-s35-s55                 
UGUAGAGA 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -9.10, deficit  1.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.55, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CUUUCCUG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_06920.1,  8 NTs,              GUUUCUAC,score     -10.42, deficit  2.78, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.48, ed 99, 2 cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35                   
CGAUAAAG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_01187.1,  7 NTs,              GAAUUAAC,score      -8.06, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.13, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35             
CGAUAUAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_20743.2,  8 NTs,             GGAUAUGGC,score     -10.89, deficit  5.52, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  41.90, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-s55-s35         
CCGCACAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_56089.1,  7 NTs,              CCGAAUAG,score      -7.61, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  41.64, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-cWW-s35-F-F-s35                 
GCAAUUCC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_84050.1,  6 NTs,              CCAGUUAG,score      -7.73, deficit  2.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.75, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cSH-s55                     
UGGUGAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_92681.4,  7 NTs,              UGAAGAAG,score      -6.99, deficit  3.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.22, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
GUAAAACC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_63285.1,  8 NTs,              GUUAAAAC,score      -7.13, deficit  2.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.64, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-F-s35       
CGAAAUGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -8.17, deficit  0.58, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  62.33, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
UUGAGCUA 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_08510.1,  8 NTs,             AUGUGCUUU,score      -9.22, deficit  3.88, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.00, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSH-s53-s53-F-s55               
UUCUUCUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_09712.1,  7 NTs,              UUCUGCGG,score      -7.93, deficit  3.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.11, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-F                           
CCUUUCAG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_33172.1,  5 NTs,             CCUUUCACG,score      -8.84, deficit  4.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.65, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55-F                   
GGGCACGC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_66171.2,  5 NTs,              CGACACAG,score      -7.95, deficit  4.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.08, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
ACUAGAUU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_93551.1,  8 NTs,              CAUGGACG,score      -9.71, deficit  2.85, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.36, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s53-F-s35-s35-s55               
GGAAAAGC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_27757.1,  6 NTs,              CGGAAAGG,score      -6.00, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.38, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-F                   
UUAGUGCA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_08002.5,  8 NTs,              GUAGAGUC,score     -10.05, deficit  6.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.31, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-F-F-s35-s35                 
CUGUUUCG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_17899.1,  8 NTs,              GUGUCUAC,score      -7.64, deficit  3.88, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.95, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-tSW-s35-s35-s35         
CUUAAGUG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_54035.5,  7 NTs,              AUUGAGUU,score      -4.37, deficit  0.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.18, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35         
GUGUAUUC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_17899.1,  8 NTs,              GUGUCUAC,score      -7.57, deficit  3.81, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.42, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-tSW-s35-s35-s35         
GGUGCAAC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_93727.3,  8 NTs,              GGUGGCUC,score      -8.41, deficit  2.63, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CUCAUGUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_60140.1,  6 NTs,             ACUGAAGAU,score     -12.20, deficit  5.09, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.63, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35                 
GGCGGGGC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -8.80, deficit  1.21, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.13, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
UGUUGAAA 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_23219.1,  6 NTs,              CGUUAAUG,score      -7.25, deficit  2.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.24, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-cSH-s55-cWH-s35-s53-s55 
CGGUCGGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_80105.3,  7 NTs,              ACUUCGGU,score      -8.36, deficit  1.72, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.32, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
AGGAGUAU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_92681.4,  7 NTs,              UGAAGAAG,score      -8.29, deficit  4.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.68, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
AGUUCAAU 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_94651.1,  7 NTs,              CGUUCUAG,score      -6.84, deficit  2.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.59, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSS-s35-s55                 
GGAUAUGC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_20743.2,  8 NTs,             GGAUAUGGC,score     -10.48, deficit  5.11, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.69, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-s55-s35         
GGAAACAC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_66171.2,  5 NTs,              CGACACAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  70.40, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
AAAGGAAU 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_01187.1,  7 NTs,              GAAUUAAC,score      -8.07, deficit  2.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.06, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35             
CCUUUGAG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_91131.1,  7 NTs,             GCUUUGGAC,score      -9.35, deficit  3.70, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.06, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35             
ACAUCAAU 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_01181.4,  7 NTs,              GCACCGUC,score      -9.07, deficit  2.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.00, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35         
AGAGAGAU 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_76406.3,  9 NTs,             GACAGAGAC,score     -11.72, deficit  6.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.25, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-s53-s53-cWH-s55-s35         
UGAUAUGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_20743.2,  8 NTs,             GGAUAUGGC,score     -12.79, deficit  7.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.95, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-s55-s35         
UUGCCUCA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_17899.1,  8 NTs,              GUGUCUAC,score      -6.05, deficit  2.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.92, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-tSW-s35-s35-s35         
GCAAAAAC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_63285.1,  8 NTs,              GUUAAAAC,score      -7.15, deficit  2.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.49, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-F-s35       
CGCUUAAAG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_73266.3,  9 NTs,             ACCGUAAAU,score      -9.48, deficit  3.82, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.92, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-cSW-cSH-s55-s35-s35-s35 
GGAGCACAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_66171.2,  5 NTs,              CGACACAG,score     -10.60, deficit  7.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.47, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
CGAAAGGGG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_20743.2,  8 NTs,             GGAUAUGGC,score      -8.96, deficit  3.59, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.61, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-s55-s35         
CGACCCUAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_36421.4,  9 NTs,             AGUUCAUAU,score      -9.72, deficit  6.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.12, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CAAUGGCGG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_61092.1,  7 NTs,            CAGUUGGGAG,score      -9.51, deficit  3.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.11, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F-F                     
GGUUCGAGC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_72066.1,  8 NTs,             UGUUCAAAG,score      -9.38, deficit  4.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.13, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-tWH-s33-F-s35-s35-s35           
UCGGAAAUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_28085.1,  7 NTs,             CAGUAAAUG,score     -10.36, deficit  4.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.46, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F                   
CAAGGAUGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_55511.1,  5 NTs,             UAACGGUAG,score     -11.36, deficit  2.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.55, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s53                     
GGUAUGAAC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_41207.1,  9 NTs,             UCUUUAAAA,score      -9.46, deficit  2.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.29, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s53-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s53-s33-s35
CUGGAGAUG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_73051.1,  8 NTs,             GAGGAGGUC,score      -9.13, deficit  3.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.02, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s33-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35
CGUUUAAAG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_41207.1,  9 NTs,             UCUUUAAAA,score      -6.75, deficit  0.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  80.44, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s53-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s53-s33-s35
CGAUCAGAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_36421.4,  9 NTs,             AGUUCAUAU,score      -8.95, deficit  5.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.62, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CCGCCCAAG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_36552.1,  6 NTs,             CCUCCUAAG,score      -8.74, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.02, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-F-s55-F                     
GAAAAUAGC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_49223.1,  7 NTs,             GAAAAAAGC,score      -7.14, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  69.29, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CGAGAAGAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_05018.4,  8 NTs,             GAAGACCAC,score      -8.64, deficit  3.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.88, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CGCUCUUGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_20743.2,  8 NTs,             GGAUAUGGC,score      -8.68, deficit  3.31, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.04, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-s55-s35         
CAUUGGUAG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_81327.2,  5 NTs,            CAGCCGGUAG,score      -9.70, deficit  1.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.98, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55-cWS-s35                         
AUCCUCAUU 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_80705.1,  7 NTs,             CUCCUCGCG,score      -6.57, deficit  0.94, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.98, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55         
CAAAAAGGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_49223.1,  7 NTs,             GAAAAAAGC,score      -9.18, deficit  3.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.02, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GCUCGUAAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_36552.1,  6 NTs,             CCUCCUAAG,score      -8.22, deficit  1.68, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  69.72, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-F-s55-F                     
CGAGGAAAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_42733.3,  8 NTs,             CGGCGAAAG,score     -10.96, deficit  2.65, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.48, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35         
AGCCGACGU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_42733.3,  8 NTs,             CGGCGAAAG,score     -10.46, deficit  2.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.72, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CCUACACUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_78457.3,  8 NTs,            GUUAAUAUUC,score      -7.79, deficit  3.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.33, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35         
CAAAAAUAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_06048.1,  9 NTs,            CAAGAAAGAG,score     -11.67, deficit  3.75, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.32, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35 
CAUUCGAAG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_72066.1,  8 NTs,             UGUUCAAAG,score      -9.25, deficit  4.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.91, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-tWH-s33-F-s35-s35-s35           
UGCGUUCAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_97733.1,  8 NTs,            CCCGGUCAGG,score     -13.73, deficit  5.65, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.08, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s55         
GGUGCAAAC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_35010.1,  8 NTs,             CUUGCAAAG,score      -8.37, deficit  1.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.96, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-cSH-s35-s35     
CGAAUAAAG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_66703.1,  7 NTs,             UGGCUAAAA,score      -8.97, deficit  2.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.91, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s53-s35         
GGAUAAAAC 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_23090.1,  8 NTs,             CGACAUAAG,score      -7.89, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.05, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GAUACCAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_68742.1,  8 NTs,             CUUGCCAAG,score      -8.75, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.55, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CAUCUAUGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_67052.1,  8 NTs,             ACUCUAAAU,score     -10.78, deficit  4.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.32, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CAUUUUCGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -14.32, deficit  7.86, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.82, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GGUUGAAAC 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_72066.1,  8 NTs,             UGUUCAAAG,score      -8.28, deficit  3.31, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  62.48, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55-tWH-s33-F-s35-s35-s35           
GGCUGCGAC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_27335.1,  6 NTs,             ACUGCAGAU,score     -11.97, deficit  5.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.50, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35                     
GGAAAGAAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_49213.1, 10 NTs,            GGAAAUGAAC,score     -11.98, deficit  5.70, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.53, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s33-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GAGAUCAAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_78724.1,  8 NTs,             AAAAUCACU,score      -8.78, deficit  2.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.60, ed 99, 2 cWW-s53-s35-s35-s35                     
CUCCAGAUG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_42733.3,  8 NTs,             CGGCGAAAG,score      -8.84, deficit  0.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.03, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35         
AGGGAAAAU 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_66703.1,  7 NTs,             UGGCUAAAA,score      -8.98, deficit  2.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.88, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s53-s35         
CGUCUUUAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_94651.1,  7 NTs,              CGUUCUAG,score     -11.88, deficit  7.45, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.90, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSS-s35-s55                 
GUAGAACUC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_08748.1,  9 NTs,             ACUCAUACU,score      -9.76, deficit  2.82, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.50, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-F-s35-s35
GCGUGAAAC 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_39334.4,  7 NTs,            CGUUGAAAAG,score     -11.21, deficit  4.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.66, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s33-s35-s33-cWS-s35-s55 
UGGUUCUAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_94651.1,  7 NTs,              CGUUCUAG,score     -13.55, deficit  9.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.02, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSS-s35-s55                 
UUCAUGGUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_14725.1,  9 NTs,             UUCAGUGUG,score      -9.54, deficit  5.11, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.11, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GCAAUCUUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_78724.1,  8 NTs,             AAAAUCACU,score      -9.88, deficit  3.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.68, ed 99, 3 cWW-s53-s35-s35-s35                     
UUGUCCACA 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_36207.1,  8 NTs,             CCUUUCACG,score      -8.44, deficit  2.46, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.82, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s35-s35-s33-s55     
CUGGGGGCG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_46891.2,  8 NTs,              AUGGUUGU,score      -8.25, deficit  1.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.71, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CAUCCGGAG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_48810.1,  7 NTs,           CAGCUGGUUAG,score     -11.22, deficit  3.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.40, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-s35-s35-F                       
CUACCCUCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_93436.1,  7 NTs,             GUUCGAUCC,score      -9.52, deficit  3.85, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.55, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-F-s35-s35                       
AUAAAAGUU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_08002.5,  8 NTs,              GUAGAGUC,score      -9.14, deficit  5.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.78, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-F-F-s35-s35                 
CAUCAGUGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_53760.2,  8 NTs,             GGUAAGUUC,score     -11.40, deficit  6.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.96, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-bif-s33-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GAAGAACAGC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_06048.1,  9 NTs,            CAAGAAAGAG,score     -13.37, deficit  5.45, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.00, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35 
GUUUAAAGCC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_30819.1,  8 NTs,            AUUGAGAGCU,score     -11.13, deficit  2.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.46, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s53-s55     
GUCGUCACCC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_37846.1,  7 NTs,            CUCCUCGCUG,score      -9.08, deficit  1.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.93, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55             
UCAUUAUGCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -13.78, deficit  7.33, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.63, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
UGCACGCGGA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_44769.1,  8 NTs,             CGCACGGAG,score     -13.55, deficit  7.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.73, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35                 
GGACUCAAGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_24323.1, 10 NTs,            GAAGUGCAAC,score     -10.86, deficit  4.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.01, ed 99, 4 cWW-s33-tWW-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GAUGGCUGGC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_03847.1, 10 NTs,            GCUGGCGGUC,score     -11.47, deficit  4.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.77, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GCAGCCCAAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_38513.1, 10 NTs,            UCAAGCCUAG,score     -12.15, deficit  5.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.47, ed 99, 3 cWW-s53-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35           
UGUUUCAAGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_72066.1,  8 NTs,             UGUUCAAAG,score     -10.85, deficit  5.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.38, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-tWH-s33-F-s35-s35-s35           
CGCCGCCGGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_67265.4, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score     -15.04, deficit  7.85, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.01, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUGGAAUCUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_78061.2, 10 NTs,            CUGCAACCCG,score     -10.35, deficit  5.84, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.29, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s33 
CAGACAAAAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_96854.1,  9 NTs,            GACUCAACAC,score     -10.53, deficit  3.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.88, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35                 
AGACUUUCGU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score      -9.70, deficit  3.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.23, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GAUGCGCAGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_31286.3,  9 NTs,           UUUGGGGAAAG,score     -13.26, deficit  7.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.10, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUAACGCGUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_04171.2, 10 NTs,           AUGAUAUGGUU,score     -13.66, deficit  6.65, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.40, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35
AUGACAAGUU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_90642.4,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score      -9.74, deficit  4.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.07, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35             
GUUUCAAUCC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_32458.2,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -12.55, deficit  4.54, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.44, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35     
CGCCUCCGAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -12.72, deficit  2.84, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.84, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CGGAGGGGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_53499.1,  4 NTs,            CAGCUGGGAG,score      -9.76, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.98, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-F                               
UGAAAAAAAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_49213.1, 10 NTs,            GGAAAUGAAC,score     -12.62, deficit  6.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.84, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s33-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GGUCCCUAAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -11.49, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.86, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GCAAGAGACC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_24323.1, 10 NTs,            GAAGUGCAAC,score     -11.94, deficit  5.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.20, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-tWW-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CGGUUUGGAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_61092.1,  7 NTs,            CAGUUGGGAG,score     -10.26, deficit  4.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.56, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F-F                     
CGUGAACUAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_83704.1,  8 NTs,            GGUGAAUGAC,score     -10.46, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.87, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-F           
AGGCUGAGAU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_53499.1,  4 NTs,            CAGCUGGGAG,score     -12.06, deficit  3.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.60, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-F                               
CGUGUUCAGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_97733.1,  8 NTs,            CCCGGUCAGG,score     -10.43, deficit  2.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.14, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s55         
UAUCUCACGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_67265.4, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score     -14.53, deficit  7.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.25, ed 99, 4 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGGAAAGGAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_90642.4,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score      -8.63, deficit  3.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.46, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35             
GGUUUAGAAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_48376.3,  9 NTs,            CGUGUGGAAG,score     -11.69, deficit  4.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.86, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGAAUCAAAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_48376.3,  9 NTs,            CGUGUGGAAG,score     -11.80, deficit  4.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.11, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUGCAUAUUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_78457.3,  8 NTs,            GUUAAUAUUC,score      -9.32, deficit  4.82, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.01, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35         
AAAUUCAUGU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_18808.1,  5 NTs,           CAAUUGGAUAG,score     -13.88, deficit  3.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.78, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35                         
AAAAGGAGAU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_51284.1, 10 NTs,            GCAAGGAGAC,score      -8.26, deficit  1.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  73.18, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35           
AUCUUGAAUU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_56500.1,  9 NTs,           GUUUUGUAAUC,score     -11.85, deficit  4.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.58, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s55-cSH-s35         
CGAAGCUAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_38513.1, 10 NTs,            UCAAGCCUAG,score     -12.01, deficit  5.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.18, ed 99, 3 cWW-s53-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35           
AGAACAAUAU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_17956.1,  8 NTs,           UGAUCAAUGAG,score     -13.58, deficit  5.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.10, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s55-tHS-s33-F-s35-s35   
GGGCCGGGGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_53499.1,  4 NTs,            CAGCUGGGAG,score     -10.94, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.31, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-F                               
CUGGUCUUCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_73235.1,  8 NTs,            CAGCACUUUG,score     -11.67, deficit  4.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.82, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s55                   
CCCCUAAUAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_67052.1,  8 NTs,             ACUCUAAAU,score     -14.20, deficit  8.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.78, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CGGGGAGAGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_48636.1,  6 NTs,             UGUGAGAGG,score     -13.69, deficit  7.16, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.49, ed 99, 2 cWW-s53-F-cWH-s55                       
GGUACUUUAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_73235.1,  8 NTs,            CAGCACUUUG,score     -13.94, deficit  6.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.14, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s55                   
CUCACUUGCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_23537.2, 10 NTs,            GUCCCAAGCC,score     -12.21, deficit  8.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.05, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35         
GCCUCUCCAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_96854.1,  9 NTs,            GACUCAACAC,score     -10.46, deficit  3.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.34, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35                 
GUUCUCCCCC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_05123.1,  9 NTs,            ACGGGGAGUU,score     -13.50, deficit  5.82, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.39, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GGAACAUUGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_90642.4,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score     -10.33, deficit  4.88, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.58, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35             
GCUGCAUAAC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_88858.1,  6 NTs,             CCUGAUAAG,score     -11.16, deficit  5.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.39, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-tSW-s55-s35         
UUCGCUCCCA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_05123.1,  9 NTs,            ACGGGGAGUU,score     -10.09, deficit  2.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  65.84, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
UAGAUUAUAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_18808.1,  5 NTs,           CAAUUGGAUAG,score     -15.82, deficit  5.54, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.87, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35                         
CGGUCUGUAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_15968.1,  8 NTs,            CAGUCGGUAG,score      -8.12, deficit  3.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.59, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s53-F               
AUGUGGUCGUU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_04171.2, 10 NTs,           AUGAUAUGGUU,score     -12.19, deficit  5.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.46, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35
GUUUGUAAUUC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_50622.6, 11 NTs,           CCUUGAGGUGG,score     -12.99, deficit  3.84, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.09, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GUGAAUACGUC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_04171.2, 10 NTs,           AUGAUAUGGUU,score     -13.65, deficit  6.64, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.46, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35
CUCCGCUCACG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_97733.1,  8 NTs,            CCCGGUCAGG,score     -15.48, deficit  7.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.47, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s55         
CGGACAGAAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_94607.1,  7 NTs,           GGCUCAUAACC,score     -12.47, deficit  3.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.00, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s53                   
AGUUCAAGUGU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_87219.4, 10 NTs,           GAUUAGAUACC,score     -14.84, deficit  7.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.28, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGAAUUUUGAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_98248.1, 10 NTs,           GUAACUAUGAC,score     -11.96, deficit  6.59, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.07, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s33-s55-s55-tHW-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35
UGAUGAGUGGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_17956.1,  8 NTs,           UGAUCAAUGAG,score     -13.09, deficit  5.24, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.89, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s55-tHS-s33-F-s35-s35   
AGGGGGAGGGU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_72714.2, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -14.77, deficit  6.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.51, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGAACCUCAAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_26772.1, 11 NTs,          CGAAUCCAUAAG,score     -14.02, deficit  4.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.61, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGGAAGAUUAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_72714.2, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -13.50, deficit  5.52, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.36, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGGGUUCCUGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_67265.4, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score     -12.82, deficit  5.64, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.04, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GAAAAAACGAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_88982.1,  8 NTs,          CAAAAUAACAAG,score     -11.11, deficit  4.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.81, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35-s35             
GGUUACAAGAC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_49992.1, 10 NTs,           GAUCAGAAUGC,score      -8.56, deficit  0.98, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.19, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGUUUCGACGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_50622.6, 11 NTs,           CCUUGAGGUGG,score     -14.31, deficit  5.16, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.11, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CGAGGAAGAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_72714.2, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -13.97, deficit  5.99, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.88, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGAAAAAAUGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_81820.1, 11 NTs,           UGAAUCCAUAG,score     -14.27, deficit  6.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.34, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-tHW-s35-tHW-s33-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGGAAACCCGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_41778.1,  6 NTs,           UAGAGGCCCAG,score     -14.18, deficit  6.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.23, ed 99, 4 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35-tSW                 
GCUGAAAAAUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_22443.1, 11 NTs,          CCUGAGAAACGG,score     -12.68, deficit  6.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.41, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-F
GCGGAAGGGAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_72714.2, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -12.85, deficit  4.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.80, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUGAUGAGAUC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_36095.1,  9 NTs,           UUGAUAUGAUG,score     -11.92, deficit  4.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  41.39, ed 99, 2 cWW-s53-s55-s33-F-F-s55                 
GUCGAGAAAUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_11805.2, 11 NTs,           GGUCGGACAUC,score     -12.29, deficit  6.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.85, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s53-F-s35-s35       
GUAUAUUUUUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_98252.1,  8 NTs,           AUUAUUUAUUU,score     -13.38, deficit  6.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.93, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-s55-tWW-s35-s53-s35-s55-s53     
AGUAUACAAAU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_81820.1, 11 NTs,           UGAAUCCAUAG,score     -15.68, deficit  7.94, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.31, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-tHW-s35-tHW-s33-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGCGAAGAAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_94607.1,  7 NTs,           GGCUCAUAACC,score     -11.38, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.15, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s53                   
UUAAAUAAAUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_43613.3,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score     -13.50, deficit  6.98, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.10, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35         
GUGAGUAAUCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_72714.2, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -14.68, deficit  6.70, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.15, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
AGAAUUGAAGU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_02483.1, 10 NTs,          UGAUCACGAAGG,score     -13.63, deficit  5.85, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.33, ed 99, 4 cWW-s55-tWH-cSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CUAGGCCAAUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_53037.1,  8 NTs,           CUAUGGCUAUG,score     -11.82, deficit  3.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.82, ed 99, 3 cWW-F-s35-s35-F-s55                     
GUCUCAGAGUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_04171.2, 10 NTs,           AUGAUAUGGUU,score     -12.31, deficit  5.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.38, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35
CGAAAGCGGGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_67265.4, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score     -14.51, deficit  7.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.36, ed 99, 4 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGGUAGCGGAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_72714.2, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -10.81, deficit  2.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.62, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUAUAAAAUCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_49992.1, 10 NTs,           GAUCAGAAUGC,score      -9.82, deficit  2.24, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.67, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUGAACUAAUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_36095.1,  9 NTs,           UUGAUAUGAUG,score     -12.89, deficit  5.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.07, ed 99, 3 cWW-s53-s55-s33-F-F-s55                 
CUCUGAUCCUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_67265.4, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score     -18.63, deficit 11.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.88, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUGCCACUACC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_78061.2, 10 NTs,            CUGCAACCCG,score     -13.62, deficit  9.11, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.81, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s33 
CACCUUUACGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_32458.2,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -14.28, deficit  6.26, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.64, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35     
CUUAGUCAAUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_56500.1,  9 NTs,           GUUUUGUAAUC,score     -10.27, deficit  2.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.44, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s55-cSH-s35         
CGACGAUAUAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_26772.1, 11 NTs,          CGAAUCCAUAAG,score     -15.06, deficit  5.33, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.07, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35
GAGAUUGAUGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_18808.1,  5 NTs,           CAAUUGGAUAG,score     -12.03, deficit  1.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.16, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35                         
UAUCAACGAAAA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_02483.1, 10 NTs,          UGAUCACGAAGG,score     -16.24, deficit  8.46, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.29, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-tWH-cSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GCGGGAAAUUUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_72714.2, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -11.46, deficit  3.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.33, ed 99, 5 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
UGUCCUCAUUAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_94032.1, 10 NTs,          UAGUCUCUUUCG,score     -12.94, deficit  3.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.40, ed 99, 4 cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
AUUCUCAUUUUU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_41207.1,  9 NTs,             UCUUUAAAA,score     -12.01, deficit  5.46, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.76, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s53-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s53-s33-s35
GAGUCCAUCGCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_25466.1, 11 NTs,          CAUUGCACUCCG,score     -13.30, deficit  6.05, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.79, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-F-s35-F-F           
GAACCUACAAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_90620.1, 11 NTs,           AACCGUAAAAU,score     -15.37, deficit  8.33, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.74, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-cSW-cSH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUAAGAUCAUUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_67265.4, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score     -17.36, deficit 10.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.13, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUGAAUCAAAUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_08291.1, 11 NTs,          CUGACCGAUAUG,score     -13.54, deficit  6.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.77, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F
CCUAGAGAAAUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_22443.1, 11 NTs,          CCUGAGAAACGG,score     -15.57, deficit  9.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.12, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-F
CUAACCAUUUCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_08291.1, 11 NTs,          CUGACCGAUAUG,score     -14.27, deficit  6.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.94, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F
GAAUGAUUCAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_88982.1,  8 NTs,          CAAAAUAACAAG,score     -10.78, deficit  3.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.31, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35-s35             
UGUGAAAUGAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_36095.1,  9 NTs,           UUGAUAUGAUG,score     -15.69, deficit  8.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.32, ed 99, 3 cWW-s53-s55-s33-F-F-s55                 
UGGGAGAUUAAA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_72714.2, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -13.80, deficit  5.82, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.67, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGCAUGGAAAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_42671.1, 11 NTs,         AGCACGUGAAAUU,score     -16.93, deficit  8.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.03, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-F-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s35           
CUCUUAAAAAUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_60326.1,  9 NTs,         GUUUACCAAAAUC,score     -14.13, deficit  6.31, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.41, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s33-s35-s35 
CUACUGAAUAUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_08291.1, 11 NTs,          CUGACCGAUAUG,score     -14.64, deficit  7.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.72, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F
AGAGAAAACGAU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_49992.1, 10 NTs,           GAUCAGAAUGC,score     -18.11, deficit 10.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.97, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
AGUCGAACAGAU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_96423.1, 10 NTs,          UAUCGGUUAGAG,score     -14.73, deficit  5.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.25, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-s35
CAAAAUAAUUCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_88982.1,  8 NTs,          CAAAAUAACAAG,score     -13.12, deficit  6.26, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.45, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35-s35             
UCCCGAACGACA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_72419.1, 11 NTs,           UUCCCAACGAG,score     -15.99, deficit  8.63, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.87, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35
GUCAUUAAACCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_30596.1,  8 NTs,          UCUAUGAUACCA,score     -11.74, deficit  3.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.13, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-F-F-s35-F                   
CUCGAAACAGCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_72714.2, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -13.72, deficit  5.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.22, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGGAAGGCUUGAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_58733.1, 12 NTs,        CGGAGCGGCUGAAG,score     -15.83, deficit  5.31, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.76, ed 99, 4 cWW-s55-s33-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-F-s35-s35 
GGGCCUUGAAAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_42671.1, 11 NTs,         AGCACGUGAAAUU,score     -14.83, deficit  6.09, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.56, ed 99, 4 cWW-s33-F-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s35           
CUUAGAAGGUACG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_07432.1, 11 NTs,        CUCAGCAGGUAGAG,score     -18.85, deficit  7.84, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.82, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-cSH-s35-s35         
GCGCGAAGAACUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_17086.2, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -17.56, deficit  6.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.37, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
UUUUACUUAGAUA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_60326.1,  9 NTs,         GUUUACCAAAAUC,score     -14.80, deficit  6.97, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.72, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s33-s35-s35 
GUUUUACAUAUCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_17086.2, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -14.27, deficit  3.31, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.48, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGAAAACCAGAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_26772.1, 11 NTs,          CGAAUCCAUAAG,score     -16.36, deficit  6.63, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.91, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGAAAACGAAUGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_19870.4, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -15.53, deficit  8.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.32, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUAGUAUCUAACC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19870.4, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -13.69, deficit  6.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.47, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GAAUGUGUCAAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_49873.1,  8 NTs,         GGAAUCGGUAGAC,score     -13.00, deficit  4.72, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.69, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-cWS-s35-cWS-s35-s35-s35 
AAAUGAGAAGCGU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_22443.1, 11 NTs,          CCUGAGAAACGG,score     -15.46, deficit  9.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.66, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-F
CGAAGGAAGAAAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_28843.1, 14 NTs,       UGAAGGCAGAAGUAA,score     -17.94, deficit  3.81, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.15, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35-s35
CACUCCGAUUUCAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_93650.1, 15 NTs,       CAUCCGAGUUGCAAG,score     -16.94, deficit  9.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.72, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35
AUGAGAGAAAGCCGAAUU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_82782.1, 18 NTs,   CUGACCGAAAGGCGUGAUG,score     -20.49, deficit  5.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.21, ed 99, 5 cWW-s55-s35-tSH-s33-s55-tHS-s33-F-s55-F-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35
UCGGAGCACUCAUCCAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_52657.1, 15 NTs,     CGGAUCAGUCACCCAAG,score     -24.65, deficit 12.99, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.05, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-tSH-s33-s55-bif-s35-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
4	100.0000	 86.8571	 78.8571	4
5	100.0000	 88.8571	 50.5714	23
6	100.0000	 87.4286	 50.2857	60
7	 99.4286	 52.5714	 15.1429	51
8	 99.1429	 28.2857	  3.4286	46
9	 98.8571	 18.0000	  1.7143	68
10	 96.0000	  7.1429	  0.0000	41
11	 82.8571	  3.1429	  0.0000	42
12	 42.5714	  0.5714	  0.0000	23
13	 18.8571	  0.8571	  0.0000	12
14	  4.8571	  0.0000	  0.0000	8
15	  1.1429	  0.0000	  0.0000	8
16	  2.2857	  0.0000	  0.0000	4
17	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	4
18	  0.8571	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
19	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
20	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	2
21	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	0
22	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	2
23	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	0
24	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
25	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
26	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
27	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	0





Model HL_00317.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  50.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGGCCUUUCUUAAAAAAAAA
Model HL_01925.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-cHW-cWH-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-s33-cWH-cHW-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-cHW-cWH-tSH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-cHW-s35-s33-s35, sequence CGAAGGGACGGUGCGGAGAGGAGAG
Model HL_03603.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AUUUUGUUGGUUUCU
Model HL_06137.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWH-s33-s33-cHW-cWH-s35-cHW-cWH-cWH-s35-cWH-s33-s55-s55-cHW-s33-cWH-s53-s35-s33-cWH-s53-s35-s33-s55, sequence UGUGGAAGGAGUGGCUGGGUUG
Model HL_07579.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.89%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UACUUAUUUCCUUUGA
Model HL_12710.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s55-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAAGCGUAAUAGCUC
Model HL_12773.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.37%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s55-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUAUUGCAGUACCUC
Model HL_30585.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.45%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSS-s35-cSW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AGUCGCGUGAUAAAUGU
Model HL_46465.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-cHW-s55-s35-cWH-s53-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-s35-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-tWW-F-s55-cWH-s35-cWH-s35-tWW-s35-tHH-s53-s35-s53-tSW-s55-s55-s33-cSH-s35-s35, sequence AGGAAGGAUUGGUAUGUGGUAUAU
Model HL_56677.4  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.36%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-tWH-s35-tSH-s55-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-tHW-s33-tSW-s35-s35-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35, sequence CUGAACGCAUCUAAG
Model HL_59564.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSS-s35-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGGCCUUUCUUAAAAAAAAA
Model HL_74088.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWH-s33-s33-cHW-cWH-s53-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-cWH-s35-cWH-s33-tSW-s55-s55-cHW-s33-cWH-s35-s33-cWH-F-s35-s33-s55-F, sequence UGUGGAAGGAGUGGCUGGGUUG
Model HL_79564.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-cHW-cWH-tSH-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-s33-cWH-cHW-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-cHW-cWH-tSH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-s33-cHW-s35-s33-s35, sequence CGAAGGAGAGGAGAGGAAGAGGAGAG
Model HL_82866.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.71%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s33-s55-s35, sequence CAACUUAGGAUUUUAGG
Model HL_92488.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.65%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s35-F-s35, sequence GAAACCGCCGAUAUGC
Model HL_08602.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-cSS-s35-s55, sequence CAAUCCGCUCUAG
Model HL_20751.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.15%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s55, sequence CAGGGGAGGAAUCG
Model HL_38011.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUUAGAAGCAGCC
Model HL_58446.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-tSW-s35-s53-F-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence GACCUAGAUCACCC
Model HL_68863.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.64%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F, sequence AGGUGGGGUUUAU
Model HL_81205.2  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.75%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-F-F-s35, sequence CACUGAGACACGGG
Model HL_82782.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  60.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-tSH-s33-s55-tHS-s33-F-s55-F-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUGACCGAAAGGCGUGAUG
Model HL_85984.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-F-s35-s35, sequence UUUCAGAGAUGAGA
Model HL_90257.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-F-s35-s35, sequence CGAAAAAAUUGGAAGUAG
Model HL_93221.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.70%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence GACCUAGAUCACCC
Model HL_98870.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-s55-tWW-s35-F-s35-s53-s55-s35-s35, sequence CGUAGGCUACAGAGAAG
Model HL_12870.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.39%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s53-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUCCUUGGGAAAC
Model HL_52657.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  75.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-tSH-s33-s55-bif-s35-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGGAUCAGUCACCCAAG
Model HL_07432.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.36%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-cSH-s35-s35, sequence CUCAGCAGGUAGAG
Model HL_12571.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.11%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-cWS-s35-tSW-s35-s33-F-F-s35, sequence CGAGCCUGGUCAAAG
Model HL_35978.6  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.00%,  12 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_93650.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.14%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35, sequence CAUCCGAGUUGCAAG
Model HL_28843.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.10%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35-s35, sequence UGAAGGCAGAAGUAA
Model HL_31581.4  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.95%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s55-s35, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_42211.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.58%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-F-F-F-F-s35, sequence UGGAAUUGGUAGACA
Model HL_58539.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  64.71%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s55-tWS-tHW-F-F-s55-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUAAAUUGGGCACUUG
Model HL_58733.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.07%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s33-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-F-s35-s35, sequence CGGAGCGGCUGAAG
Model HL_89082.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.90%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGAAUACGACC
Model HL_20714.1  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAUGGGAUGUCGU
Model HL_94032.1  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.06%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UAGUCUCUUUCG
Model HL_22443.1  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-F, sequence CCUGAGAAACGG
Model HL_25466.1  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-F-s35-F-F, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_86109.1  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.30%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGGCGGUGGGAGC
Model HL_07268.1  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s53-s53-s35-s35, sequence CAAUUUAUACAG
Model HL_10751.2  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.62%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F-s33, sequence CAGCCUGGUAG
Model HL_43488.1  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-s35, sequence AACGCUUGCGUU
Model HL_70505.1  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.66%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWW-s35-s35-s35-F-s55-s35, sequence GAUCAGCCAUGC
Model HL_96423.1  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-s35, sequence UAUCGGUUAGAG
Model HL_60326.1  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s33-s35-s35, sequence GUUUACCAAAAUC
Model HL_72419.1  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.12%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUCCCAACGAG
Model HL_30596.1  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-F-s35-F, sequence UCUAUGAUACCA
Model HL_42671.1  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.24%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s35, sequence AGCACGUGAAAUU
Model HL_19870.4  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.18%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUAAAAGGUAACG
Model HL_22576.1  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s55-F-s55-s35-F-s35, sequence CCUAAUUAGUGG
Model HL_49873.1  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-cWS-s35-cWS-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGAAUCGGUAGAC
Model HL_20891.1  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.37%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-s33-F-s55-s35-s53-s55, sequence CAAUAUCGAAG
Model HL_03847.1  matched a sequence  15 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.67%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUGGCGGUC
Model HL_19162.2  matched a sequence  17 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGAACACUAUAC
Model HL_19398.1  matched a sequence  18 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-cWS-s35-cSH-s35, sequence CAAGCGGUAAG
Model HL_38513.1  matched a sequence  18 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.34%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UCAAGCCUAG
Model HL_36421.4  matched a sequence  19 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AGUUCAUAU
Model HL_88982.1  matched a sequence  19 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35-s35, sequence CAAAAUAACAAG
Model HL_98885.3  matched a sequence  19 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGUGCACAC
Model HL_86843.1  matched a sequence  20 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAAGCGGUUAU
Model HL_90620.1  matched a sequence  20 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-cSW-cSH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AACCGUAAAAU
Model HL_11805.2  matched a sequence  21 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s53-F-s35-s35, sequence GGUCGGACAUC
Model HL_52853.1  matched a sequence  21 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s35-F, sequence CAGGCGGUUAG
Model HL_92304.3  matched a sequence  21 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.01%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUUAGAAGCAG
Model HL_98248.1  matched a sequence  21 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.71%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s55-s55-tHW-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35, sequence GUAACUAUGAC
Model HL_35188.1  matched a sequence  22 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s33-F, sequence CAGCCUGGGAG
Model HL_56500.1  matched a sequence  22 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s55-cSH-s35, sequence GUUUUGUAAUC
Model HL_81820.1  matched a sequence  22 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.16%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s55-tHW-s35-tHW-s33-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAAUCCAUAG
Model HL_18808.1  matched a sequence  23 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35, sequence CAAUUGGAUAG
Model HL_02483.1  matched a sequence  24 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-tWH-cSH-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAUCACGAAGG
Model HL_08291.1  matched a sequence  24 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F, sequence CUGACCGAUAUG
Model HL_17086.2  matched a sequence  24 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAUGUAAAUACCU
Model HL_26501.1  matched a sequence  24 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F-F, sequence CAGCUACUCG
Model HL_32255.1  matched a sequence  24 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s33-cWW-F-cSS-s53-s55-s35, sequence UUUUUUAAUG
Model HL_51090.1  matched a sequence  24 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F, sequence CAGCUGGUCAG
Model HL_94607.1  matched a sequence  25 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s53, sequence GGCUCAUAACC
Model HL_51284.1  matched a sequence  26 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCAAGGAGAC
Model HL_98252.1  matched a sequence  26 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s55-tWW-s35-s53-s35-s55-s53, sequence AUUAUUUAUUU
Model HL_19958.1  matched a sequence  28 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUAGUGGUAUC
Model HL_72451.4  matched a sequence  28 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.87%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s35, sequence GGAACAAC
Model HL_86378.1  matched a sequence  28 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSH, sequence UUUCGUGUG
Model HL_10536.1  matched a sequence  29 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s33-F-s35, sequence GUUGGAUAUC
Model HL_19239.1  matched a sequence  29 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.72%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCCUGGUAG
Model HL_08510.1  matched a sequence  31 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s53-s53-F-s55, sequence AUGUGCUUU
Model HL_02811.1  matched a sequence  32 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence AGGGAUUUU
Model HL_37846.1  matched a sequence  32 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55, sequence CUCCUCGCUG
Model HL_48962.1  matched a sequence  32 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-s35-s35-s53, sequence CAAAAAUGAAG
Model HL_23537.2  matched a sequence  33 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35, sequence GUCCCAAGCC
Model HL_53037.1  matched a sequence  33 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-F-s55, sequence CUAUGGCUAUG
Model HL_14725.1  matched a sequence  34 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUCAGUGUG
Model HL_33239.14 matched a sequence  34 times, TP  96.30%, TN  96.01%, 108 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUCGAUUC
Model HL_78061.2  matched a sequence  35 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s33, sequence CUGCAACCCG
Model HL_96854.1  matched a sequence  35 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35, sequence GACUCAACAC
Model HL_29487.1  matched a sequence  36 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.79%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-s35-s55, sequence CUGAUG
Model HL_67216.4  matched a sequence  36 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.82%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence CGGCGAG
Model HL_58200.1  matched a sequence  38 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s55, sequence CCUCACACG
Model HL_63693.1  matched a sequence  39 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGCAUAACAA
Model HL_97733.1  matched a sequence  39 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s55, sequence CCCGGUCAGG
Model HL_17956.1  matched a sequence  40 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s55-tHS-s33-F-s35-s35, sequence UGAUCAAUGAG
Model HL_50537.2  matched a sequence  40 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35-s35, sequence ACUGUUAAU
Model HL_24323.1  matched a sequence  41 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-tWW-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGUGCAAC
Model HL_33172.1  matched a sequence  41 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55-F, sequence CCUUUCACG
Model HL_41778.1  matched a sequence  41 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35-tSW, sequence UAGAGGCCCAG
Model HL_43613.3  matched a sequence  41 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35, sequence UUUAUUAAAAA
Model HL_50622.6  matched a sequence  41 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CCUUGAGGUGG
Model HL_23481.4  matched a sequence  43 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-F-s35, sequence GAAACAUC
Model HL_67265.4  matched a sequence  43 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   8 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUUGAUCCUGG
Model HL_05123.1  matched a sequence  44 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACGGGGAGUU
Model HL_36095.1  matched a sequence  44 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s55-s33-F-F-s55, sequence UUGAUAUGAUG
Model HL_59710.7  matched a sequence  44 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,  32 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUCAUAAC
Model HL_72714.2  matched a sequence  44 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UAGGGAACGGGA
Model HL_36207.1  matched a sequence  45 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s35-s35-s33-s55, sequence CCUUUCACG
Model HL_73235.1  matched a sequence  45 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s55, sequence CAGCACUUUG
Model HL_92681.4  matched a sequence  45 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAAGAAG
Model HL_18785.1  matched a sequence  46 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.83%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35, sequence UAAGGG
Model HL_41851.1  matched a sequence  46 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s33-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence CCUUACGAG
Model HL_53499.1  matched a sequence  46 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-F, sequence CAGCUGGGAG
Model HL_15968.1  matched a sequence  47 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s53-F, sequence CAGUCGGUAG
Model HL_26772.1  matched a sequence  47 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGAAUCCAUAAG
Model HL_27359.1  matched a sequence  47 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s55, sequence CAGCCUGGUAG
Model HL_32458.2  matched a sequence  47 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUUCGAAUCC
Model HL_91503.2  matched a sequence  48 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s33-s35, sequence GUUCGUGGAGC
Model HL_09712.1  matched a sequence  49 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F, sequence UUCUGCGG
Model HL_91131.1  matched a sequence  49 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUUUGGAC
Model HL_37694.1  matched a sequence  50 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-F-s35, sequence GUUCGAAUC
Model HL_70682.1  matched a sequence  50 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s53-s33-s35-s55-s35, sequence GUCAAGAUUC
Model HL_35888.1  matched a sequence  51 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35-s35, sequence AGGCAAUU
Model HL_43074.14 matched a sequence  51 times, TP  97.44%, TN  95.97%, 273 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAAAA
Model HL_44911.1  matched a sequence  51 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-F-F, sequence AGGCAAUU
Model HL_49213.1  matched a sequence  51 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s33-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGAAAUGAAC
Model HL_59445.1  matched a sequence  51 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-s35-s35, sequence CAAUAGG
Model HL_01008.4  matched a sequence  52 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F, sequence GAUCAC
Model HL_80705.1  matched a sequence  52 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55, sequence CUCCUCGCG
Model HL_04171.2  matched a sequence  53 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35, sequence AUGAUAUGGUU
Model HL_73051.1  matched a sequence  53 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s33-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAGGAGGUC
Model HL_02733.4  matched a sequence  54 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence CAUGCCG
Model HL_31286.3  matched a sequence  54 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUUGGGGAAAG
Model HL_93436.1  matched a sequence  54 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-s35-s35, sequence GUUCGAUCC
Model HL_30819.1  matched a sequence  56 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s53-s55, sequence AUUGAGAGCU
Model HL_44769.1  matched a sequence  56 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.74%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGCACGGAG
Model HL_67044.1  matched a sequence  56 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s33-F-s35, sequence AUGUCGUUU
Model HL_73266.3  matched a sequence  56 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,  12 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-cSW-cSH-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACCGUAAAU
Model HL_78457.3  matched a sequence  56 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUAAUAUUC
Model HL_39334.4  matched a sequence  57 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s33-s35-s33-cWS-s35-s55, sequence CGUUGAAAAG
Model HL_41207.1  matched a sequence  57 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s53-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s53-s33-s35, sequence UCUUUAAAA
Model HL_49992.1  matched a sequence  57 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAUCAGAAUGC
Model HL_55046.1  matched a sequence  57 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s55, sequence GUUUAUC
Model HL_68478.1  matched a sequence  57 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35, sequence GCUUGC
Model HL_81327.2  matched a sequence  57 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35, sequence CAGCCGGUAG
Model HL_90642.4  matched a sequence  57 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GUGAAGAUGC
Model HL_55511.1  matched a sequence  59 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s53, sequence UAACGGUAG
Model HL_38646.2  matched a sequence  60 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUAAUGC
Model HL_79299.9  matched a sequence  60 times, TP  98.08%, TN  95.66%,  52 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55, sequence CUUCGG
Model HL_48810.1  matched a sequence  61 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s35-F, sequence CAGCUGGUUAG
Model HL_97049.1  matched a sequence  62 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-cSH, sequence CAGUCGGUAG
Model HL_03427.1  matched a sequence  63 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s35-s33, sequence UCUCAUAAG
Model HL_06048.1  matched a sequence  63 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35, sequence CAAGAAAGAG
Model HL_30937.1  matched a sequence  63 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUAACGC
Model HL_34135.1  matched a sequence  63 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUUUUGAUA
Model HL_36552.1  matched a sequence  63 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-F-s55-F, sequence CCUCCUAAG
Model HL_23090.1  matched a sequence  64 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGACAUAAG
Model HL_23219.1  matched a sequence  64 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-cSH-s55-cWH-s35-s53-s55, sequence CGUUAAUG
Model HL_46891.2  matched a sequence  64 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AUGGUUGU
Model HL_49194.1  matched a sequence  64 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGACGAUC
Model HL_01187.1  matched a sequence  65 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.10%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35, sequence GAAUUAAC
Model HL_48376.3  matched a sequence  65 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGUGUGGAAG
Model HL_99402.3  matched a sequence  65 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGAUUACCUG
Model HL_06645.1  matched a sequence  66 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-F-F-s35, sequence CUUCAACG
Model HL_17926.4  matched a sequence  66 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGUAAGUAA
Model HL_49223.1  matched a sequence  66 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAAAAAGC
Model HL_61092.1  matched a sequence  66 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   8 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F-F, sequence CAGUUGGGAG
Model HL_78724.1  matched a sequence  66 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAAAUCACU
Model HL_32512.6  matched a sequence  67 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,  16 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GACUGGC
Model HL_68742.1  matched a sequence  67 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.78%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUUGCCAAG
Model HL_76406.3  matched a sequence  67 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s53-s53-cWH-s55-s35, sequence GACAGAGAC
Model HL_05832.1  matched a sequence  68 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55-s35, sequence GCGAAAGAC
Model HL_49816.1  matched a sequence  68 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s55-s33, sequence GAAAGACC
Model HL_72066.1  matched a sequence  68 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-tWH-s33-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGUUCAAAG
Model HL_08002.5  matched a sequence  69 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  14 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-F-F-s35-s35, sequence GUAGAGUC
Model HL_83225.1  matched a sequence  69 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CGUAUUG
Model HL_87219.4  matched a sequence  69 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAUUAGAUACC
Model HL_35491.2  matched a sequence  70 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GAAACAC
Model HL_50374.1  matched a sequence  70 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence UAAUUCA
Model HL_73793.2  matched a sequence  70 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAUAAAAGC
Model HL_08748.1  matched a sequence  71 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-F-s35-s35, sequence ACUCAUACU
Model HL_17899.1  matched a sequence  71 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-tSW-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUGUCUAC
Model HL_83704.1  matched a sequence  71 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-F, sequence GGUGAAUGAC
Model HL_90197.1  matched a sequence  71 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.69%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35, sequence UGUAGG
Model HL_93727.3  matched a sequence  71 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  22 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUGGCUC
Model HL_26055.5  matched a sequence  72 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  15 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUUCUAC
Model HL_35010.1  matched a sequence  72 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-cSH-s35-s35, sequence CUUGCAAAG
Model HL_63285.1  matched a sequence  72 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-F-s35, sequence GUUAAAAC
Model HL_67205.1  matched a sequence  72 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.63%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-s53, sequence CAUUCG
Model HL_69677.1  matched a sequence  72 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.85%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-F, sequence CUUUUUG
Model HL_27757.1  matched a sequence  73 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-F, sequence CGGAAAGG
Model HL_43610.4  matched a sequence  73 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35, sequence GGAGACC
Model HL_96487.1  matched a sequence  73 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.42%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CAUGUAG
Model HL_05018.4  matched a sequence  74 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGACCAC
Model HL_06920.1  matched a sequence  74 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUUCUAC
Model HL_20743.2  matched a sequence  75 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGAUAUGGC
Model HL_27747.3  matched a sequence  75 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.86%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55-cSH, sequence AGAAAUU
Model HL_88225.1  matched a sequence  75 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35, sequence CAGGGGUAG
Model HL_28085.1  matched a sequence  76 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.72%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F, sequence CAGUAAAUG
Model HL_33612.1  matched a sequence  76 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWH-F-F-s55, sequence CUUUUGG
Model HL_67052.1  matched a sequence  76 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUCUAAAU
Model HL_93551.1  matched a sequence  76 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-F-s35-s35-s55, sequence CAUGGACG
Model HL_53760.2  matched a sequence  77 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  10 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-s33-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUAAGUUC
Model HL_66171.2  matched a sequence  77 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35, sequence CGACACAG
Model HL_66703.1  matched a sequence  77 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s53-s35, sequence UGGCUAAAA
Model HL_88858.1  matched a sequence  77 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-tSW-s55-s35, sequence CCUGAUAAG
Model HL_27335.1  matched a sequence  78 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35, sequence ACUGCAGAU
Model HL_48636.1  matched a sequence  78 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-F-cWH-s55, sequence UGUGAGAGG
Model HL_46771.1  matched a sequence  79 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-tSS-cSS-s55-s35, sequence AUUGAAAAU
Model HL_15942.4  matched a sequence  80 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.34%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35, sequence UUUAGG
Model HL_94651.1  matched a sequence  80 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSS-s35-s55, sequence CGUUCUAG
Model HL_01181.4  matched a sequence  81 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCACCGUC
Model HL_34974.1  matched a sequence  81 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55-s55, sequence CUUCGG
Model HL_37407.1  matched a sequence  81 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35, sequence GAGUAUC
Model HL_75091.3  matched a sequence  81 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUUGCGGGAC
Model HL_77081.1  matched a sequence  81 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.75%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-s55-s35, sequence UGAAAAG
Model HL_93229.1  matched a sequence  81 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CCUUGAG
Model HL_93573.1  matched a sequence  81 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.52%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35, sequence CCUUGUG
Model HL_59297.1  matched a sequence  82 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.57%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-F-F, sequence GCUUAGGC
Model HL_54035.5  matched a sequence  83 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence AUUGAGUU
Model HL_68493.4  matched a sequence  83 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence CUGGGAUG
Model HL_18495.1  matched a sequence  84 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUGCAGAU
Model HL_84050.1  matched a sequence  85 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSH-s55, sequence CCAGUUAG
Model HL_50959.1  matched a sequence  87 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAUGAG
Model HL_69774.3  matched a sequence  88 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.65%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s33-tSW-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAACAC
Model HL_90961.1  matched a sequence  88 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55, sequence CGCAUAG
Model HL_35894.3  matched a sequence  89 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s33-F-s35, sequence UAGUAA
Model HL_46463.1  matched a sequence  90 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.57%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence UUUCGA
Model HL_01472.3  matched a sequence  91 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSW-F-s55-s53, sequence GUCCGGC
Model HL_49196.2  matched a sequence  91 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s55-s35, sequence AUUCCCAUU
Model HL_80105.3  matched a sequence  91 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.90%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUUCGGU
Model HL_25183.1  matched a sequence  92 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.06%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35, sequence CUGUUCG
Model HL_56089.1  matched a sequence  93 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWW-s35-F-F-s35, sequence CCGAAUAG
Model HL_60357.1  matched a sequence  93 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35, sequence GUAUUC
Model HL_24625.1  matched a sequence  94 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-s55, sequence CAGUG
Model HL_16845.5  matched a sequence  95 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35, sequence CUUAUCG
Model HL_24403.1  matched a sequence  97 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.38%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAAAUC
Model HL_68529.1  matched a sequence  97 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.84%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence GAGUCC
Model HL_51033.1  matched a sequence  98 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGUCUC
Model HL_60140.1  matched a sequence 103 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUGAAGAU
Model HL_86769.2  matched a sequence 104 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSH-s55, sequence AGGGUCAU
Model HL_42733.3  matched a sequence 107 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGGCGAAAG
Model HL_58912.1  matched a sequence 108 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F, sequence CUGUUG
Model HL_41285.1  matched a sequence 109 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.81%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35, sequence GAACUC
Model HL_44730.2  matched a sequence 117 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.96%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CCUUGG
Model HL_52240.1  matched a sequence 120 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.40%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence AAAUUU
Model HL_69818.1  matched a sequence 121 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.47%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSW-s35-s55, sequence UGUAAG
Model HL_80171.1  matched a sequence 123 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.43%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s35-s35-s33, sequence GUCUC
Model HL_12053.1  matched a sequence 124 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.41%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35, sequence CGCAACG
Model HL_30541.1  matched a sequence 126 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.29%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-F, sequence CAUUCG
Model HL_32617.1  matched a sequence 127 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.75%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH, sequence UUGGUA
Model HL_44781.1  matched a sequence 133 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.24%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35, sequence GUUCAC
Model HL_25660.1  matched a sequence 134 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.45%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-F-s35, sequence CGAAUAG
Model HL_62869.2  matched a sequence 136 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.78%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGGAAC
Model HL_14859.1  matched a sequence 141 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.15%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-F-F, sequence GGAAAC
Model HL_82678.2  matched a sequence 142 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F, sequence CAUGUGG
Model HL_00996.1  matched a sequence 148 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.30%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence GUCUUC
Model HL_46142.7  matched a sequence 149 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.37%,  20 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUACUUGA
Model HL_96283.1  matched a sequence 158 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.53%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUUAUG
Model HL_98995.6  matched a sequence 163 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.01%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UACCAA
Model HL_53189.1  matched a sequence 164 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.51%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s53, sequence CUCUG
Model HL_56387.1  matched a sequence 164 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.44%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWH-s35-s53-s55, sequence AUUUU
Model HL_04891.1  matched a sequence 169 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.73%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGAGAG
Model HL_69941.1  matched a sequence 171 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.16%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CGCGUG
Model HL_32527.2  matched a sequence 176 times, TP 100.00%, TN  90.59%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35, sequence GGAAAC
Model HL_76360.1  matched a sequence 185 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GUGUCC
Model HL_43527.1  matched a sequence 192 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.16%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGCCGAG
Model HL_18218.2  matched a sequence 193 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.92%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35, sequence GCCUAGGAC
Model HL_14286.1  matched a sequence 198 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-F-s35, sequence CGGAUG
Model HL_40469.1  matched a sequence 201 times, TP 100.00%, TN  90.30%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F, sequence CGAAUAG
Model HL_70970.1  matched a sequence 203 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.28%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-s35, sequence UCUAA
Model HL_86880.4  matched a sequence 209 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.90%,  12 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUCGUC
Model HL_96776.2  matched a sequence 211 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.95%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-F, sequence AAAAUU
Model HL_33507.2  matched a sequence 226 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-s55, sequence UUUUA
Model HL_02361.5  matched a sequence 227 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.81%,  16 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAACAA
Model HL_16898.2  matched a sequence 229 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55, sequence UGAAAGG
Model HL_22515.1  matched a sequence 233 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.44%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-F, sequence UGAAAA
Model HL_69459.1  matched a sequence 236 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW, sequence CGCGUG
Model HL_28567.3  matched a sequence 238 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.35%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GAGUAC
Model HL_12703.2  matched a sequence 243 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.54%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GGCCC
Model HL_79272.2  matched a sequence 252 times, TP 100.00%, TN  79.73%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35, sequence CGCAG
Model HL_57204.1  matched a sequence 257 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.20%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-F-s35, sequence UGGAAA
Model HL_53987.3  matched a sequence 270 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.17%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWS-s35, sequence CUUAG
Model HL_94352.4  matched a sequence 274 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.05%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-F, sequence CUAAGUG
Model HL_46546.1  matched a sequence 277 times, TP 100.00%, TN  83.15%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-s35, sequence CUUG
Model HL_62604.1  matched a sequence 297 times, TP 100.00%, TN  86.94%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s53-s53-s35, sequence UGAAAA
Model HL_05692.1  matched a sequence 302 times, TP 100.00%, TN  81.31%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CGUAGG
Model HL_68304.6  matched a sequence 305 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.45%,   8 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGACGAG
Model HL_36982.3  matched a sequence 351 times, TP 100.00%, TN  78.34%,  10 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUGUG
Model HL_99223.1  matched a sequence 358 times, TP 100.00%, TN  76.92%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s33-s55-s35, sequence UUUAA
Model HL_06569.1  matched a sequence 363 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.49%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35, sequence AGAAUU
Model HL_94386.1  matched a sequence 369 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.73%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-F-s35, sequence GUGAAGC
Model HL_57052.2  matched a sequence 370 times, TP 100.00%, TN  75.19%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35, sequence GUCAC
Model HL_95237.1  matched a sequence 372 times, TP 100.00%, TN  77.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35, sequence UUUGA
Model HL_61984.1  matched a sequence 374 times, TP 100.00%, TN  77.73%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUCGG
Model HL_02906.1  matched a sequence 375 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.26%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s35, sequence UGUAAG
Model HL_69353.6  matched a sequence 382 times, TP 100.00%, TN  68.81%,  17 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUAG
Model HL_60914.1  matched a sequence 384 times, TP 100.00%, TN  77.56%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CUGGG
Model HL_18722.1  matched a sequence 507 times, TP 100.00%, TN  66.50%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-F, sequence GUCUC
Model HL_98557.4  matched a sequence 520 times, TP 100.00%, TN  70.07%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CAGAG
Model HL_05667.1  matched a sequence 569 times, TP 100.00%, TN  67.15%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55, sequence GGUAC
Model HL_22447.1  matched a sequence 699 times, TP 100.00%, TN  66.20%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-s55, sequence UUUUCA
Overall false positive rate is 35.2857%
Number of models giving false positives is 295 out of 310
Rate at which sequences have interior edit distance 0 is     8.33
Rate at which sequences have cutoff score greater than 50 is    15.57
